Peer Review in Social Protection and Social Inclusion and Assessment in Social Inclusion

Skip to content. | Skip to navigation

You are here: Home Newsletter UK ‘welfare city’ model seeks local partnerships to tackle unemployment and child poverty
Document Actions

UK ‘welfare city’ model seeks local partnerships to tackle unemployment and child poverty

Newsletter 2009-3

Publication date : 2009-11-25

The July 2009 Peer Review took place in the East End of London – an area with some of the highest levels of poverty and deprivation in the country. The topic of discussion was the UK’s ‘City Strategy’ for tackling unemployment and child poverty, launched in 2007 as part of the government’s wider welfare system reform.

The East London Metropole Learning centre is just one example of how unemployment and child poverty issues can be overcome by facilitating collaboration between local partners (including government agencies, the private sector and NGOs) and marshalling existing funding streams to maximise their value.

The centre, visited by the reviewers, was one of a group of five London-based training centres specialising in ESOL – English for Speakers of Other Languages – and ‘employability skills’ for adults. A private (for profit) organisation, the main objective of the Metropole Learning centre is to provide foreigners with the language skills they require in their specific occupation or sector of specialisation. In parallel, the centre uses a variety of methods to engage potential employers and even offers pastoral care for those learners with personal or family issues that might represent a barrier to employment.

Around 4,000 learners per year follow the centre’s programmes, among which almost nine out of ten achieve at least one qualification and around one in three is placed in employment. For those who do not find work immediately, further job preparation and search support is available.

Key to the centre’s success is its strong integration in the local community, enabling a good understanding of the students and a strong and trusted relationship with the local business community – both of which are essential when seeking to persuade an employer to take a gamble on the learners.

Since 2007, the centre has received support through the City Strategy and continues to operate through effective partnerships with a wide range of government and non governmental bodies.

Other visits were made to the ‘Single Point of Access’ and ‘Groundwork Newham’ projects.

In simple terms, the policy is based on the premise that local people know more about the situation in their area, are more committed and are able to make better use of available resources. The basic idea is thus to help local partners work together and deliver coordinated services to achieve real improvements in employment levels. At the same time, this new form of “devolved welfare state” can help to mobilise the resources of the public, private and voluntary sectors and to combine them towards shared objectives.

Since 2007, fifteen ‘Pathfinder’ areas – mainly major cities and urban areas, where employment levels are furthest from the UK’s 80% target – have been required to each develop their own business plans and local targets in terms of employment rates and reduced dependency on social benefits.

Target groups are of two kinds: direct and indirect. Direct targets groups are the so-called ‘hard-to-help’, such as longterm claimants of job-seeker allowances and beneficiaries of income support and incapacity benefits. They include lone parents, immigrants and refugees, persons over 50, exoffenders, those with drug and alcohol problems, care leavers, people with mental health issues and young people that are not in education, employment or training. Indirect target groups are the public, private and voluntary sectors that are to be brought together as partners in a concerted local programme.

Despite difficulties linked to the economic and financial crisis, the initiative has shown signs of success and, in 2008, it was decided to extend it for a further two years until March 2011. It has nevertheless been made clear that no further support will be provided from then onwards and that Pathfinders are expected to have merged into independent Local and Multi Area Agreements by then.

While reviewers lauded the initiative’s overall goal of increasing employment, they nevertheless felt more should be stated about the quality and sustainability of jobs provided. Also, it was felt that while the initiative has a child poverty agenda, this is not made explicit enough as this is a vital objective that should not be lost. The same goes for the gender issue, which should be developed more explicitly within an equal opportunities framework.

In terms of transferability to other countries, reviewers felt that, to be successful, such an initiative requires a strong civil society with an already well-developed NGO network. Overall the City Strategy initiative was nevertheless seen as an interesting approach to harnessing existing resources and to make best use of them by providing a coherent one-stop-shop approach in the delivery of social and employment services. This is essential in order to support the most vulnerable people suffering from multiple disadvantages, in line with the EU active inclusion common principles and guidelines.

 

http://www.peer-review-social-inclusion.eu/peer-reviews/2009/city-strategy-for-tackling-unemployment-and-child-poverty