Peer Review in Social Protection and Social Inclusion and Assessment in Social Inclusion

Skip to content. | Skip to navigation

You are here: Home Newsletter The Peer Reviews in Social Protection and Social Inclusion 2008
Document Actions

The Peer Reviews in Social Protection and Social Inclusion 2008

Newsletter 2008-1

Publication date : 2008-07-01

Austria – 24-25 April: Initiatives by the social partners for improving the labour market access of disadvantaged groups

Access to employment is a key requirement for people to be able to avoid the risk of poverty and social exclusion and social partners are of central importance in this respect. This Peer Review presents initiatives taken by the Austrian social partners to help integrate four disadvantaged groups in particular (young people, older people, those not working because of industrial injuries or illnesses and people with disabilities more generally), into work.

Poland – 27-28 May: Public information on pension systems

Pension reforms have been implemented or are underway in most Member States, many adding to the complexity of pension arrangements while giving individuals more choice over the schemes they opt for. This Peer Review was arranged to gain a deeper understanding of how the demand and supply of information has changed since reforms to pension systems in Member States have been introduced. It covers three main points: information regarding changes to pension systems, information on pension rights and information on choices in pensions.

Belgium – 12-13 June: The social economy from the perspective of active inclusion

This Peer Review focuses on the potential contribution of the social economy to creating jobs for disadvantaged groups while at the same time providing much needed services. The aim is not only to enable Member States to exchange views and experience on this but also to make public authorities at all levels aware of the possibilities which development of the social economy offers.

Germany – 30 June-1 July: Cost containment in the pharmaceutical sector while ensuring fair access

Given the dynamic developments in the pharmaceutical markets, it is a significant challenge for Member States to ensure the common values and objectives for health systems in the EU. This exchange of experiences and views between Member States, together with stakeholders, helps them identify ways in which cost containment measures can be improved.

Spain – 20-21 October: Support Fund for the Reception, Integration and Education of Immigrants

Spain has experienced a substantial increase in immigration from outside the EU in recent years, adding significantly to both the population and the labour force. The Peer Review will present details of the Support Fund, established in 2005 as part of a broader strategy to integrate migrants into society and maximise their contribution to the economy.

Slovakia – 6-7 November: Social impact assessment

Member States are giving increasing importance to assessing the likely social effects of policies which they plan to introduce. Slovakia is currently developing a unified assessment methodology. This Peer Review will provide an opportunity for an exchange of experience on social impact assessment.

Germany – 17-18 November: Return of women to the labour market

A widespread aim across the EU is to increase the employment rate of women. This requires that women are able to continue their working careers after having children. The Peer Review provides an opportunity for Germany to present the action being taken to help women do this and relay their experience.

Denmark – 5 December: Combining choice, quality and equity in social services

The Peer Review will focus on ways of introducing market mechanisms into the provision of social services to give consumers more choice over the services they receive, to link supply more closely to demand and to encourage competition between providers with the aim of increasing quality and curbing costs. Although the schemes vary between countries, they have sufficient features in common that Member States can learn from the experience of their implementation elsewhere.

 

http://www.peer-review-social-inclusion.eu/peer-reviews/2008